Legal Opinion

Blumeno v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a verdict and judgment in his favor for the sum of $30. The action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff upon occasion of his having been denied admission to defendant's train, and his ejection therefrom by defendant's brakeman.

The plaintiff testified that, when he came to the rear end of the train, there were two or three men behind him, and the brakeman told him that he “should let by those men,'' and, after they got on the car, he said, “You can't get in here on this car;" that he could not ride in that car,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Sheahan v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Jankowski v. SkupnyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API