Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. John Doe, M.D. And Steve Roe, Witnesses-Appellants v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1986No. 86-2351, 86-2353PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
Dr. John Doe and Steve Roe, 1 targets of a grand jury investigation into illegal dispensation of anabolic steroids, androgenic hormones and other such drugs, appeal a contempt order for failure to comply with a subpoena duces tecum. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826(b), this motions panel was required to rule by August 28, 1986. On August 27, we affirmed the district court’s contempt order. Because we are faced with issues of first impression in this circuit, we now explain our reasoning.
BACKGROUND
Anabolic steroids and androgenic hormones are regulated as prescription drugs under the Federal Food,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Pagano v. Oroville HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Commonwealth v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- United States v. Keithan Jerome OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Securities and Exchange Commission Richard G. Shaffer, Receiver, Plaintiffs v. Elmas Trading Corporation, and James L. AttarianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.