Legal Opinion

Brummer v. Brummer

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 27, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is opened to fix the form of judgment and allowance for counsel fee and costs. There are three motions which were heard as one.

The defendant by his motion seeks a reduction in the amount of his monthly alimony payments. I determined to dismiss this motion on two grounds: (1) that because of his delinquencies his application for relief could not be entertained (Cooper v.Cooper, 103 N.J. Eq. 416 (Ch. 1928)), and I could find no mitigating circumstances by way of a substantial compliance with the existing order as in Traudt v. Traudt, 116 N.J. Eq. 75 (E. A. 1934); Williams v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armour v. ArmourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  2. Rufner v. RufnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. Traudt v. TraudtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Cooper v. CooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Ramhorst v. RamhorstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coffman v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API