Legal Opinion
Kerr v. McDonald's Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 20, 2004No. CIV.A.1:03CV1328-CCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COOPER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant McDonald’s Corporation’s (“Defendant” or “McDonald’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the evidence of record, as well as the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion is due to be GRANTED. 1
1. BACKGROUND
A. Preliminary Matters 2
As an initial matter, the Court needs to clarify here the origin of its background facts. The facts set forth herein were taken from the relevant facts in Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts that were admitted by Plaintiffs Christine…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Preserve Endangered Areas of Cobb's History, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. Shoe Show, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- Profit v. Americold Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Nguyen v. Civil Air Patrol(MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021