Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1984No. C4-84-253PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

• Respondent petitioned for reinstatement of his driving privileges after the Commissioner of Public Safety revoked his license for at least two years, required proof of rehabilitation, including at least two years of abstinence for reinstatement, and denied a limited license for work. Respondent sought an order of the county court to issue a limited license. The county court declined, noting respondent’s “extensive driving record involving the use of alcohol.” The district court found that respondent should not have been required to file evidence of rehabilitation after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. BaruttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Pruszinske v. State, Commissioner of Highways, State Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hintz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Sullivan v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Phillippe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. GeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API