Legal Opinion

People v. Becerra

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 2008No. G038851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Defendant Juan Pablo Becerra challenges his convictions for two counts of murder, three counts of street terrorism, and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon. He contends the indictment underlying the murder counts and two of the street terrorism counts was impermissibly based on perjury before the grand jury, and insufficient evidence corroborated the testimony of his accomplices. But defendant suffered no prejudice from the pequry—the trial jury heard about the witness’s perjury and still found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. And all accomplice…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mason v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Chavez v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Mason v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Peopld v. Hong, S.Superior Court of Guam · 2019
  5. People v. HewininSuperior Court of Guam · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API