Legal Opinion
Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Adochio
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 26, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-3958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Henkels & McCoy, Inc. brings this action under N.J.Stat.Ann. § 42:2A-46(b) against nineteen limited partners of Red Hawk North Associates, L.P. (“Red Hawk”), a New Jersey limited partnership. Plaintiff alleges that these defendants have received cash distributions from Red Hawk in violation of the Red Hawk Agreement of Limited Partnership and the Red Hawk Limited Partnership Certificate. Plaintiff seeks to have these funds returned to Red Hawk in order that a judgment plaintiff has obtained against Red Hawk may be satisfied. This Court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. AdochioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- HENKELS McCOY, INC. v. ADOCHIOCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. AdochioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Paramount Aviation v. AgustaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999