Hammond v. Central Lane Communications Center
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment for defendants in this action for “outrageous conduct” and for negligence.
On July 28, 1986, plaintiff found her husband lying on the kitchen floor in their home. She called 911, and the operator concluded from plaintiffs answers to his questions that the husband was probably dead. The operator told plaintiff, “We’ll have someone there in just a couple minutes.” The 911 system is operated by defendant Central Lane Communications Center (center), but it routes requests for services to other agencies rather than performing them itself. The center…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Horwell v. Oregon Episcopal SchoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hammond v. Central Lane Communications CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Hammond v. Central Lane Communications CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1991