Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Central Lane Communications Center
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1991No. CC 16-87-09193; CA A50155; SC S37277Published
1Opinion of the Court
816 P.2d 593 (1991)
312 Or. 17
Mary HAMMOND, Petitioner On Review,
v.
CENTRAL LANE COMMUNICATIONS Center; City of Eugene; Lane County Oregon; Oregon State Police; Lane County Sheriff's Department and Various Unnamed Employees of the above, Respondents On Review.
TC 16-87-09193; CA A50155; SC S37277.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted January 22, 1991.
Decided August 22, 1991.
Ralph A. Bradley, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioner on review. With him on the petition, was Bradley & Gordon, P.C., Eugene.
John B. Arnold, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondents on review Central…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.