Carr v. Town of Bridgewater
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, John F. Carr, Jr., established that he had a constitutional entitlement to the zoning permit for which he had applied. The defendants, the town of Bridgewater, the Bridgewater planning and zoning commission (zoning commission), the Bridgewater conservation and inland wetlands commission (inland wetlands commission) and certain individuals,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, Moraghan, J., rendered after a jury verdict for compensatory and punitive damages in favor of the plaintiff. This appeal stems from the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Kosinski v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Kelley Property Development, Inc. v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Norton v. Corrales, Village OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Wrinn v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.