Legal Opinion
Bernardez v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 9, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Fraiman, J.), entered August 5,1983, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time barred, affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
*310Subdivision 3 of section 625 of the Banking Law provides that an action by claimants against a receiver of a failed bank for recovery upon a nonapproved claim must be filed “[a]t the expiration of eighty days after the last date fixed by the superintendent for the presentation of claims and at any time within six months thereafter”. This requirement has been construed to be a condition precedent to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carrick v. Central General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Camarella v. East Irondequoit Central School BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Zuroff v. Westchester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Matter of Morris Investors, Inc. v. Comm'r of Fin. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Dreger v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Morris Investors, Inc. v. Commissioner of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Fleming v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.