Strong v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMacKenzie, J.
In 1974, plaintiffs purchased forty-four acres of undeveloped land in Section 3, Forest Township, Cheboygan County. Before purchasing the property, plaintiffs obtained an abstract and had it updated and certified by defendant Burton Abstract and Title Company. They then obtained two title opinions. When it appeared that all clouds on title had been removed, plaintiffs received a warranty deed which contained two descriptions, one of a forty-acre parcel, essentially consisting of the NW 14 of the SW 14 of Section 3, and one of an adjoining four-acre parcel, located in the NW 14 of Section 3.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Burns v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Birkenshaw v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Emmons v. EasterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- MacKinac Island Development Co. v. Burton Abstract & Title Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Ludington & Northern Railway v. Epworth AssemblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cipriano v. ToccoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- Davids v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.