Legal Opinion

In Re Sealed Case

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 20, 1987No. Misc. 87-0197, 87-0205 and 87-0215PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., Chief Judge.

(THIS MEMORANDUM SHALL BE FILED IN THE PUBLIC RECORD, AS IT DOES NOT REVEAL THE NATURE OR CONTENTS OF ANY SEALED MATERIAL.)

This sealed matter presents for determination by the Court the question of whether the Independent Counsel provisions of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq., comport with the Constitution of the United States. After consideration of a number of submissions concerning this issue, 1 the Court holds that the statute is constitutional.

INTRODUCTION

The historical background of and need for the Independent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re Sealed Case (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. CisnerosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API