Legal Opinion
FAITH TEMPLE CHRUCH v. Town of Brighton
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 9, 2004No. 04-CV-6355LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
By letter dated November 17, 2004 (Docket #40), counsel for defendants in this action requested that I recuse myself from this case because my son has been offered, and has accepted, an associate position with the law firm of Nixon Peabody LLP, which represents plaintiff. In response to the Court’s directives, plaintiff has responded by way of an affidavit of counsel, setting forth certain information concerning my son’s prospective employment at Nixon Peabody. Defendants’ motion is denied.
The relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. § 455, provides in pertinent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America Ex Rel. David P. Weinberger, and David P. Weinberger, Esq., Individually v. Equifax, Inc. (Formerly Retail Credit Company)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In the Matter of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Melcher v. Apollo Medical Fund Management L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Kapila v. Clark Ex Rel. Matthew Wortley Trust (In Re Trafford Distribution Center, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2010