Legal Opinion
Canal Insurance v. Blankenship
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided January 30, 2001No. CIV.A. 5:00-0143PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are cross-motions for summary judgment by 1) Plaintiff Canal Insurance Company (Canal); 2) Defendants Christal Pearl Blankenship, Rebecca Keneda, and Robert Blankenship (Blankenship Defendants); and 3) Defendant Susan Keneda. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion and DENIES Defendants’ motions.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 3, 2000 Robert Keneda was operating an automobile owned by Susan Keneda in which Tony and Robert Blankenship were passengers. A 1993 Mack truck was pulling a 1998 Pitts pup trailer,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Payne v. WestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Mike Ross, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2006
- Lloyd v. Travelers Property Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Lucero v. Northland Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- Lucero v. Northland InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company v. Bible Baptist ChurchDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.