Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided October 8, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Director, John W. Maile,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion. You have asked, in effect, the following questions:

1. What classes of potential claimants may recover under theprovisions of 1999 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 155, 3 (to be codifiedas 47 O.S. 583(E)(1)(e) (1999)), which requires a bond to beposted by a dealer or salesperson licensed by the Used MotorVehicle and Parts Commission? 2. Does the language regarding "any person" in the secondsentence of 47 O.S. 583(E)(1)(e) (1999) mean that "anyperson" who is injured through any of the actions set forth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Durant v. Changing, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Hiller v. RistSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API