Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Keally

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1911No. Appeal, No. 168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 168, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Second T., 1908, No. 598, discharging rule for judgment in ease of The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Charles L. Keally, Sr., trading and doing business as Charles L. Keally, Sr. & Co. Assumpsit for demurrage charges. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 168, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Second T., 1908, No. 598, discharging rule for judgment in ease of The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Charles L. Keally, Sr., trading and doing business as Charles L. Keally, Sr. & Co. Assumpsit for demurrage charges. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The following opinion of Carnahan, J., states the case: The plaintiff company, being a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, and engaged as a common carrier in the business of transporting goods and merchandise,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The order discharging the rule for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Carnahan.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. ColesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Garrison Coal Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API