Kiper v. Novartis Crop Protection, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ 1 Motion To Dismiss Counts III and IV or Alternatively For Summary Judgment 2 . Because the Court considered matters outside of the pleadings in reaching its decision, the Court will treat this motion as a motion for summary judgment. 3 For reasons which follow, the defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
The defendants, now collectively referred to as Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (“Syngenta”), contracted with several engineering firms to provide services to their St. Gabriel plant. Each of the plaintiffs had…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Wallace v. Texas Tech Univ.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.