Sohn v. Flavin
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.
In February, 1930, plaintiff instituted this action against Edward Henschel (now deceased). The complaint set forth two causes of action, one upon a promissory note, and one upon money had and received. The first cause of action set forth certain payments made upon the note (which had been executed and delivered in December, 1919), the last of such indorsements being the sum of $59.67 alleged to have been paid on March 15, 1928. To this complaint defendant Henschel interposed the following answer:
“I Defendant denys each and every allegation of the plaintiff’s complaint not hereinafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sluman v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- McKinley v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Clemmons v. . FieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Hurle v. HurleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- McDonald v. EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Eby v. MisarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Dunham v. First National Bank in Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Phipps v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Payton v. RogersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.