Legal Opinion

Jack Roach-Bissonnet, Inc. v. Puskar

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1967No. A-11083PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*263WALKER, Justice.

This is a products liability case arising out of a one-car accident. Recovery is sought against the manufacturer and the dealer on grounds of breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence in refusing to repair. We hold that neither defendant is legally responsible for the accident, because the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to show: (1) that the representation relied upon was false, or (2) that the accident was caused by the failure to repair or by any defect existing at the time the automobile was delivered.

Daniel J. Puskar, plaintiff, sustained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford Motor Company v. PuskarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Turner v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Darryl v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pittsburg v. PonderTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Bell Helicopter Co. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API