Legal Opinion

Hindle v. Dillbeck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 20, 1971No. 70-225, 70-226 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guild

This appeal arises from a summary judgment for defendants grounded on the theory that plaintiffs are bound by applicable provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act in that plaintiff Hindle’s injuries and the death of Joyce Lynn Pakenham arose out of their employment and that their right to maintain a common-law action for negligence against their fellow employees and their employer is barred as a matter of law.

We have examined the pleadings, affidavits, and excerpts of depositions presented to the trial court to determine, when viewed most strictly against the moving party and most…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sjostrom v. SprouleIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. PothsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Ruby v. WaymanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Irwin-Neisler & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hindle v. DillbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Becke v. Fred A. Smith Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Walker v. Midwest Emery Freight SystemsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Stockton v. MendozaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Kachigian v. MinnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API