Legal Opinion

Martin v. Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Pleadings. Easements. Actions. Damages. Torts. Amendment. Before Judge Estes. Hall Superior Court. August Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

This was a suit for damages, resulting from the stopping Up of a sewer-pipe carrying off water from a dry well on plaintiff’s premises and discharging it on defendant’s land. The original declaration failed to allege that plaintiff had a right, either by grant or prescription, to an easement thus to empty the water from the pipe on the land of defendant; the court allowed, over defendant’s objection, an amendment to the declaration, averring substantially these facts. After the amendment was made, on motion of defendant, the suit was dismissed, and to this judgment of dismissal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. LaceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  2. Goldsmith v. Elsas, May & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  3. Rome Gas-Light Co. v. MeyerhardtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Bell v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Louisville & N. R. R. v. Pointer's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Johnson Lumber Co. v. Akers Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Atlanta Enterprises Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API