Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wells

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1947No. 8 Div. 391PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The bill seeks the cancellation of a deed executed October 11, 1944, by the complainant to his son, the defendant; and from a decree overruling demurrer to the bill as amended defendant appeals.

The trial court correctly observed that the demurrer was to the bill as a whole .and of consequence if the bill has equity in any of its aspects the demurrer is due to be overruled.

The first insistence on the part of counsel for defendant questions the sufficiency of the bill upon the matter of description of the property involved in this litigation. We are cited to Roney v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Randolph v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Hogan v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Woodlawn Realty & Development Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Alabama State Milk Control Board v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith-Howard Gin Co. v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Cook v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API