Legal Opinion
Foster v. Williams
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided May 21, 2002No. 06-01-00161-CVPublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice CORNELIUS.
Murrell and Carolyn Foster appeal from the dismissal of their lawsuit. The trial court construed the Fosters’ cause of action as an action to quiet title and dismissed the action because the statute of limitations for that type of claim had expired.
The initial question we must answer is whether we have jurisdiction to determine the appeal. The judgment was signed on September 12, 2001, and the Fosters filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on September 17, 2001. They filed a document on December 11, 2001, that was treated as a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mansfield State Bank v. CohnTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Linwood v. NCNB TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Martinez v. El Paso County, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
- Warwick Towers Council of Co-Owners Ex Rel. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Park Warwick L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Paselk v. Rabun, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Corona v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Martinez v. Leeds, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.