Quigley v. Welter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $83.43 for money had and received to the use of plaintiff. The case was tried before Baxter, J., who found in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for á new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The facts in this case áre as follows: On July 12,1902, P. I. Quigley, ■a section foreman in the employ of the Northern Pacific Railway Company, made an assignment to plaintiff of the wages thereafter to be ■earned by him under that employment for the definite period of six months from that date. Plaintiff was Quigley’s daughter, and the •consideration of the assignment was her services in caring for his ■other children, he being a widower. There is no claim that the assignment was made for the purpose of hindering, delaying, or defrauding creditors. At the time the assignment was made,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- O'Connor v. MeehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Steinbach v. BrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Grand Lodge v. TowneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Kastner v. Dalton Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Dennis v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Leonard v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.