Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Robertson

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 2, 1927No. 1123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, District Judge.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed under the provisions of section 9 of the Trade-Mark Act of February 20, 1905 (chapter 592, 33 Stat 724; Comp. St. § 9494), and section 4915 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 9460), in accordance with the ruling laid down in American Steel Foundries v. Robertson, 262 U. S. 209, 43 S. Ct. 541, 67 L. Ed. 953. The purpose of the suit is to secure an adjudication authorizing the commissioner of patents to register a mark under the Trade-Mark Act in accordance with an application therefor filed by the complainant in the Patent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Samson Cordage Works v. Puritan Cordage MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  5. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971
  3. Car-Freshner Corporation v. Marlenn Products CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  4. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Dura Electric Lamp Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API