Legal Opinion

In re Cynthia S. Malyszek

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2018No. 17-BG-663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this case, the Board on Professional Responsibility concurred with the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee's findings and recommended discipline. In its report, the Board acknowledged that the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee found that respondent Cynthia Malyszek had committed numerous violations in the course of her representation of three clients; however, in accepting the recommendation of disbarment the Board relied on the factual findings that respondent engaged in at least reckless misappropriation of client funds in the Mills matter. Specifically, respondent failed to deposit the retainer she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re VieheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API