Legal Opinion
Lanigan v. Village of East Hazel Crest
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 26, 1996No. 94 C 2818PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Defendants previously moved this court to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. On May 18, 1994, the court stayed discovery for the purpose of researching and filing motions on the issue of qualified immunity. The two motions filed addressed that concern and otherwise generally moved for a dismissal with prejudice. The court granted the motions on May 16,1995. Before the court is a motion to reconsider. For the following reasons the motion is denied.
FACTS
Plaintiff John Lanigan claims that a left hand turn he made eventually reached issues of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John Lanigan, Sr. v. Village of East Hazel Crest, Illinois, Officer Robert Wasek, Chief Ray RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Trout v. FregaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996