Legal Opinion

Cox v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 2003No. COA02-1143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

Petitioners appeal from an order affirming a decision by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Oxford to issue a Special Use Permit to respondents David Drye Company (“Drye Co.”) and Mr. and Mrs. Franklin Hancock, IV. Petitioners assert three arguments on appeal: (1) that respondents did not make a prima facie showing that its application met the requirements for issuance of a permit; (2) that *475the change in membership of the Board of Adjustment deprived petitioners of due process; and (3) that the familial relationship between the respondent landowners and the acting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Leiphart v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SUSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. County of Lancaster v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dellinger v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Dellinger v. Lincoln Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API