Legal Opinion
D'AQUISTO v. Campbell Industries
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1984No. Civ. 31084PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
Plaintiffs Tony D’Aquisto, et al., are commercial fishermen on the motor vessel Christina C. Their action sought recovery from Campbell Industries for negligent repair of the vessel which resulted in lost fishing time and thus the fishermen’s lost share of the catch. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Campbell. The fishermen appeal.
On November 26, 1979, the owners of the Christina C entered into a written contract with Campbell for repair work. The agreement provided, in pertinent part: “It is further agreed by the parties hereto that the contractor will…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Madison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Coates v. Newhall Land & Farming, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Heredia v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Scroggs v. Coast Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Money Store Investment Corp. v. Southern California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.