Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Eisenman
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurrence
W. JONES, J.,
specially concurring.
I join the majority’s holding that the Estate cannot recover damages available under the wrongful death statute, I.C. § 5-311, such as loss of care, comfort, companionship, and society. See generally Horner v. Sani-Top, Inc., 143 Idaho 230, 141 P.3d 1099 (2006) (discussing available damages). I further join the majority’s holding that Respondents waived the estoppel issue by failing to cite authority or to argue the point. I write separately to highlight my reasons for reaching those conclusions.
The key to resolving this case is to differentiate between two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Hayward v. Valley Vista Care Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Horner v. Sani-Top, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Vulk v. HaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.