Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Eisenman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2012No. 38703Published

1Concurrence

W. JONES, J.,

specially concurring.

I join the majority’s holding that the Estate cannot recover damages available under the wrongful death statute, I.C. § 5-311, such as loss of care, comfort, companionship, and society. See generally Horner v. Sani-Top, Inc., 143 Idaho 230, 141 P.3d 1099 (2006) (discussing available damages). I further join the majority’s holding that Respondents waived the estoppel issue by failing to cite authority or to argue the point. I write separately to highlight my reasons for reaching those conclusions.

The key to resolving this case is to differentiate between two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hayward v. Valley Vista Care Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Horner v. Sani-Top, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Vulk v. HaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API