Giddings v. Iowa Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Palo Alto District Court. — Hon. W. B. Quarton, Judge. Action to recover possession of a promissory note and the mortgage securing it. There was a trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff-s. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
I. The record before us discloses these fact©: The plaintiff© .are husband .and wife. F. H. Giddings, the husband, was for some years the cashier of defendant bank, which is located at Ruthven, in this state. During the time he occupied this position he made loans of the bank’s fund© to- himself, and to the firm of Galkins & Giddings, of which he was a. member, .and also to F. W. Galkins, the senior member of said firm. Some of the loans 'were without security, and in other cases the security was insufficient. Early in January, 1894, Giddings resigned as cashier, and the president of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. JaquesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Meech v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Schultz v. CatlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Green v. ScranageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Beindorff v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Kwentsky v. SirovySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Ewing v. Van AlstineUtah Supreme Court · 1903
- Hankins v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State Bank v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.