Legal Opinion
United States v. Laflin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1928No. 5233PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Counsel for the government assert that the principal point involved on the writ of error is presented in their assignment that the court below in appraising damages failed to diminish the gross probable income of the venture by deducting therefrom the probable expenses and outlay, including the cost of service and wages of necessary employes. To that proposition are cited cases such as Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Co., 240 U. S. 264, 280, 36 S. Ct. 300, 307 (60 L. Ed. 636) in which it was said: “No more definite or certain method of estimating the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Taber v. JennyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1856
- Coffin v. JenkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1844
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Miller Industries, Cross-Appellants v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Burford Equipment Co., Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.