Legal Opinion
LeBlanc v. Ford Motor Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 6, 1963PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
LeBlanc obtained a verdict in this action to recover for injuries suffered when he was struck by an automobile. It was alleged that the vehicle had been manufactured negligently by the defendant (Ford). Ford has argued various exceptions, including those (a) to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict, and (b) to the admission of expert testimony. The evidence is stated in its aspect most favorable to LeBlanc.
LeBlanc was employed by a Ford dealer. On September 27,1958, he was given by one Grodish, his foreman, the keys to a new nine-passenger automobile which the dealer had sold but…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Albert C. Peterman v. Indian Motorcycle Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- John Alexander and Annie Alexander v. Nash-Kelvinator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nathan Richman, Administrator v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Swartz v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. RembiszewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.