Albert C. Peterman v. Indian Motorcycle Company, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Chief Judge.
The appeal in No. 4860 is from a judgment for the defendants entered May 27, 1954, in accordance with a jury verdict in a personal injury case, and from a subsequent order of the district court denying a motion for a new trial duly filed within ten days after the entry of said judgment. Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Laying aside the merits of the appeal for later discussion, we have no doubt that the notice of appeal in this case was procedurally appropriate. It may perhaps be helpful to make some brief comment on the procedure involved:
Some…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Bergeron v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Midland Terminal Ry. Co. v. WarinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,534 United States of America v. John Dioguardi and Louis OstrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Marshall v. NugentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
- John E. Smith's Sons Company v. Lattimer Foundry & MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.