Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Steidman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 12, 1913No. 19,394PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa; Robert Ellis, Judge. Action by Henry E. Cunningham against Mrs. Beatrice R. Steidman and husband. From a judgment for defendants on an exception to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

Plaintiff alleges that under a writ of fi. fa. issued upon a judgment rendered against him in favor of Edwards Bros., Limited, his homestead was seized, and sold at public sale, and was bought by one A. M. Edwards, who afterwards- sold it to M. T. Tucker, who, in turn, sold it to the defendant; that said sheriff’s sale was null, because made in violation of article 245 of the Constitution, which provides that “no court or ministerial officer of this state shall ever have jurisdiction, or authority, to enforce any judgment, execution, or decree, against the property exempted as a homestead,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. O'NealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  2. Gibson v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roberson v. Pioneer Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Garrett v. Pioneer Production Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Cloud v. CloudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Andrews v. McCreary Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Acosta v. Whitney Nat. Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API