Legal Opinion

Schattman v. Maze Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The Maze Realty Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of November, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the New York Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

On the 14th of September, 1909, the defendant and one Moses Harlam entered into an agreement whereby the former as landlord leased to the latter as tenant certain premises for the term of ten years. Pursuant to certain provisions of the lease and subsequent modifications thereof, the tenant deposited with the landlord the sum of $2,000 to be held as security for the rent and the faithful performance of the covenants of the lease, which, at the termination of the lease, was to be returned to the tenant provided he had complied “with all the covenants and conditions of said lease.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Scott v. . MontellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berg v. BatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Rosen v. SuffinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
  3. Richards v. BrowningAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
  4. Levitt v. GriswoldNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Windsor Const. Co. v. RulandNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API