Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Suffin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

The lease held by plaintiff from defendant expired, and (in his first cause of action) plaintiff sues to recover the amount of a deposit made by him “ as security for the faithful performance of all terms, covenants and conditions in the (within) lease contained.” The repayment portion of the deposit clause is as follows: “ If, however, all terms, covenants and conditions are fully complied with, then in that event the said security shall be returned to the party of the second part (plaintiff) at the expiration of this lease, with interest thereon at the rate of three per cent per annum.”

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seidlitz v. . AuerbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Spence v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Scott v. . MontellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Schattman v. Maze Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ehrhart v. Frances Hat Shop, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931
  2. Richards v. BrowningAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API