A.D. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLagoa, J.
A.D., a juvenile, appeals from a withhold of adjudication and judicial warning for third degree grand theft. Because there is insufficient proof that the value of the stolen items was more than $300, we are compelled to reverse and remand with instructions to reduce the finding of guilt for third degree grand theft to petit theft.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In case no. 08-4408, the State charged A.D. with burglary of an unoccupied conveyance, burglary of an occupied dwelling, criminal mischief, and grand theft in the third degree. The trial court found him not guilty of burglary of an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. FluellenSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Gilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Weatherspoon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Bloodsaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James Tindal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Newland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Colletti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- AD v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- E.G., a child v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.