James Tindal v. State

James Tindal appeals his judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of burglary of a dwelling, grand theft, and two counts of petit theft. Tindal raises four issues on appeal. We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s denial of Tin-dal’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to the sufficiency of the State’s evidence establishing Tindal’s involvement as a principal to the crimes. However, we reverse the trial court’s denial of Tindal’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to the charge of grand theft, reverse on the grounds of double jeopardy, and reverse as to one of the…