Legal Opinion
Marfil Properties, Inc. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided November 7, 1957No. Claim No. 33122; Claim No. 33122-A; Claim No. 33122-B; Claim No. 33122-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chables Lambíase, J.
In our accompanying decision we have made findings of essential facts, and we have arrived at appropriate conclusions of law. However, we set forth in this memorandum certain points which we deem proper and which may be discussed more appropriately herein than in said decision.
The proper rule governing condemnation proceedings in cases of this sort is stated in Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Gamse & Brother (132 Md. 290, 293) where the court said: ‘ ‘ In proceedings instituted to condemn the reversionary interest, as well as the leasehold interest, the rule is to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Miller v. . LeviNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Mayor of Baltimore v. LatrobeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Carlock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Gamse & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Dothan v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Geary v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bodnar Industries, Inc. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1959