Brigham v. Zaiss
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Tyler Brigham, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 26tli day of October, 1899, denying his motion for a discovery and inspection of the defendants’ books of account.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
On the 3d of June, 1896, the parties to this action entered into a written agreement by which the defendants agreed to employ the plaintiff as a salesman “ to sell their goods, only in the territory known as the ‘ Eastern States,’ upon a commission of five percen turn upon the net amount of money realized ” by defendants from such sales.
This contract, the plaintiff alleges, was, by mutual agreement between the parties thereto, altered in so far as to allow him commissions upon all sales made to purchasers in the territory mentioned (except to one Hollander) whether the said…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Funger v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- New York Edison Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- City of Miami v. Florida Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Moraff v. KohnNew York Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.