Legal Opinion

New York Edison Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ApReal by file defendant, The Oity of Hew York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the. Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the- clerk of the. county of Hew York on the 7th day of April, 1909, denying the defendant’s motion for an inspection and discovery.

1Opinion of the Court

MoLaughlin, J.:

This action was brought to- recover from the city of Yew York ■ the value of the electricity furnished to it for lighting purposes-during the year 1903. The theory of the plaintiff, as appears from the complaint, is that a contract, was entered into between it and the city by virtue of which the electricity was f urnished and that the price which the city agreed to- pay, and which it has been charged, is a fair and reasonable value and the market value of the same¿

The answer denies that the electricity furnished was in pursuance of a. contract and that the price charged was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harbaugh v. Middlesex Securities Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Brigham v. ZaissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Funger v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  2. New York Edison Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. City of Miami v. Florida Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. United Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API