Legal Opinion

Cambria v. Bachmann

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, PRESIDENT:

Respondents Carl G. Bachmann, prosecuting attorney of Ohio County, and Harry T. Clouse, sheriff of said county, have been ruled before us upon the petition of Joseph Cam-bria and others, to show cause why they should not be punished as for a contempt of this court for alleged violation of the process, awarded February 10, 1923, of appeal from and supersedeas to a decree of the circuit court of said county dissolving an injunction in the chancery cause of said Cambria and others against respondents and Fred H. Frazier, chief of police of the City of Wheeling.

The grounds upon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. License Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Bettman v. HarnessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Swinburn v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Ruhl v. RuhlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. State v. CalandrosWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. 25 Slot MacHinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Weis v. AllmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Prendergast v. DwyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API