Legal Opinion

State v. Alarcon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 2019No. A17-1325PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHUTICH, Justice.

*643In this case we consider what it means to "leave[ ] a primary address" under Minnesota's predatory-offender registration statute, which makes an offender's knowing failure to register a felony offense. Minn. Stat. § 243.166, subds. 3a(a), 5(a) (2018). A jury found appellant Jose Alarcon, Jr. ("Alarcon") guilty of knowingly failing to register as a predatory offender when he did not register with local law enforcement authorities within 24 hours of leaving his registered primary address, a motel room in Albert Lea.

Alarcon appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed, concluding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sean Michael Wocelka v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. SeguraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. SeguraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Joshua Henry Baion CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota v. Terry Izeal HeggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API