State v. Alarcon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CHUTICH, Justice.
*643In this case we consider what it means to "leave[ ] a primary address" under Minnesota's predatory-offender registration statute, which makes an offender's knowing failure to register a felony offense. Minn. Stat. § 243.166, subds. 3a(a), 5(a) (2018). A jury found appellant Jose Alarcon, Jr. ("Alarcon") guilty of knowingly failing to register as a predatory offender when he did not register with local law enforcement authorities within 24 hours of leaving his registered primary address, a motel room in Albert Lea.
Alarcon appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed, concluding…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sean Michael Wocelka v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. SeguraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. SeguraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua Henry Baion CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Izeal HeggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.