Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 26, 1952No. 404PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry, J.:

Two contentions are asserted under the defendant’s motion to suppress. Under the first contention he suggests that if a person, such as himself in the present case, is taken into custody and, thereafter, detained under the provisions of the Uniform Arrest Act, supra, and during the first two hours of his detention, thereunder, submits voluntarily to a sobriety test, but is not arrested and charged with crime or released by the detaining officer at the expiration of two hours from the commence ment of his detention, then such neglect or default on the part of the detaining officer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Commonwealth v. MustoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Rickards v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. State v. CramOregon Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. American Fork City v. CrosgroveUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. ThomasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API