Hadden v. A & P Tea Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent · McFADDENMcFADDEN, Justice
I am of the opinion that the award of the Industrial Accident Board should be affirmed. The reasons for this conclusion are set out below.
In this proceeding the claimant had been employed as a seasonal worker by the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company at its potato processing plant at Burley, Idaho. While so employed claimant suffered a personal injury caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment when she bumped her left elbow on some machinery while performing her job, following which injury she timely filed a notice of injury and claim for compensation.…
Also in this document: Dissent · Bakes.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bower v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Blackburn v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Rodius v. Coeur D'Alene Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Zapantis v. Central Idaho Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.