Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Department of Corrections

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2007No. 78715-8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Appellants John Anderson and Frank Nordlund are inmates at the Clallam Bay Corrections Center. Both were sentenced to life without the possibility of parole or release (LWOP). In recent years, each has received income from nonwork-related outside sources, including funds sent to them by family members. The Department of Corrections (Department) deducted 20 percent of those deposits for application toward Anderson’s and Nordlund’s court-ordered legal financial obligations (LFOs). They argue that these deductions violated RCW 72.09.480(7), which sets forth specific deductions to be taken…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Darkenwald v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. City of Spokane v. RothwellWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Spokane v. RothwellWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API