Legal Opinion

City of Spokane v. Rothwell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2009No. 81271-3PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶1 — The city of Spokane asks this court to reverse a Court of Appeals decision invalidating two municipal court convictions. The Court of Appeals reasoned that the district court judge who presided over the trials did not have jurisdiction because the election was not limited to city voters as provided by former RCW 3.46.070 (1984), repealed by Laws op 2008, ch. 227, § 12. The Court of Appeals also ruled that the judge did not have de facto jurisdiction. We hold that former RCW 3.46.070 did not apply to district court judges sitting as part time municipal judges in municipal departments and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ImmeltWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Washington Federal v. HarveyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Skinner v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Skinner v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API