People v. Ditchik
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Our modification of the judgment of conviction requires the reversal of so much of the judgment as convicts the defendant, under count two of the indictment, of an attempt to commit the crime of bribery. (Penal Law, §§ 2, 378.) “ Acts in furtherance of a criminal project do not reach the stage of an attempt unless they carry the project forward within dangerous proximity to the criminal end to be attained.” (People v. Werblow, 241 N. Y. 55, 61, 62; People v. Collins, 234 N. Y. 355, 359, 360.) In an effort to establish the defendant’s guilt under count two the prosecution introduced testimony…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WerblowNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by20 opinions
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. TrepanierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.